Showing posts with label technology transfer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology transfer. Show all posts

Friday, September 26, 2008

Get On the Bus

If you have not yet experienced "Digital Natives" in their natural habitat, come on over to my house on any weekend. When I wander down stairs on a Saturday or Sunday morning, the scene is always pretty much the same. The TV is on and yammering away. But my kids are far more engaged in their respective laptops than they are in the TV making noise in the foreground. My 6 year old is likely buying a new go kart for his Webkinz monkey. My 8 year old is busy shooting balloons on Addicting Games. My 11 year old is blogging about some great new Japanese rock band video he found on YouTube. My 13 year old is reading the latest news about his favorite performers on Broadway.com. And, amazingly, while "watching" TV and voraciously consuming the Web, my children are more than capable of fighting with each at the same time -- digital multitasking at its finest.

Digital Natives today may be a small group of non-voting, non-credit card holding kids. But soon Digital Natives will be the predominant consumers of media, goods, services. And as such, they will expect their experiences to be inherently digital. Analog experiences will be viewed as quaint -- perhaps they'll trigger nostalgia for the good old days of board games and books -- but, in the end, the expectations will be one hundred percent digital. Companies will need to think differently about how they market to Digital Natives. Governments will need to think differently about how they engage Digital Citizens. Doctors will need to think differently about how they treat Digital Patients. It won't be an evolution -- it will need to be a revolution.

I already see this revolution when I'm pitched on businesses whose customers are kids. Businesses focused on children or Millennials (the next big group of consumers being chased by the advertising world) have no interest in the historically analog world. Their products are naturally digital. They acquire customers digitally. They interact digitally. Indeed, any analog byproduct of the digital experience (you know, like meet real humans in person) is just that, a byproduct. Kids want their media consumption, their shopping, their communications to be digital. Webkinz is a great example of this phenomenon -- who would have thought that stuffed animals could prove to be the gateway drug to a digital experience? Yet that is precisely what they have become.

In light of all that, it was great to read the timely new book by John Palfrey and Urs Gasser called "Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives." John and Urs look into the opportunities and challenges posed by this digital revolution. Those of us with kids are living in and among the Digital Natives and certainly can use all the help we can get to navigate this brave new world both for ourselves and for our kids.

When I was about 6 or 7, my family got our first VCR. Every time the electricity would go out my Dad would have me reset the clock because he could never figure it out himself. When I moved out on my own my Dad gave me that VCR. He said that the blinking light drove him crazy (without me around the clock was never set and just flashed 0:00). Now he has an MP3 player that he loaded with songs, and figured out how to play it through his car stereo. I rode in the car with him the other day and I noticed the dashboard clock was blinking the "0:00." When I asked him about it he said, "I can't figure it out," as he clicked from Carly Simon to The Beatles on his Mp3 Player. Some things don't change, but he is learning the new technology to suit his needs, which I'm sure a lot of you are having to do. As for telling time? Right now, my Dad's content wearing a watch.

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Innovation and Entrepreneurship Seen as Key to Economic Prescription

I presented the Golden Capital Venture Communities model of cross-regional collaboration to catalyze innovation, entrepreneurship and private investing on a panel at a federal economic development forum this week in Alexandria, VA. (hosted by International Economic Development Council).

Never before in all my years of covering politics and economics as a journalist or working with companies, investors and communities to foster entrepreneurial networks, have I witnessed such optimism in the face of such potential calamity. It was a windy day inside the beltway, which I think lent a spirit of hope to the proceedings. It felt unusually fresh and invigorating, not hot and frustrating like Washington wind often does. In any case, it packed a punch.

Congressman Paul Kanjorski, the PA Democrat who chairs the house Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises, keynoted the luncheon and sent the strongest message. "This seems to be a very upbeat meeting, which is good. All the indicators, data and forecasts we have indicate, however, that not only are we in a recession, but we might well be headed for much, much worse. It's the kind of data that might make you want to put your head in a cannon and pull the trigger."

The 300 or so attendees -- mainly economic developers, tech transfer pros, and innovation policy wonks from across the U.S. -- nearly choked on their cheesecakes. Kanjorski lightened up some by the end of his speech, and everyone went on with their business of networking and finding out about what's cutting edge in fostering innovation and entrepreneurship for economic development, but I couldn't get his harbinger of "slow spiralling meltdown" out of my head as I flew home to Chico the next day amidst new records announced for a barrel of crude, a gallon of gas, and mortgage default rate.

Bringing innovation to market was a key theme of Kanjorski's prescription for avoiding utter economic catastrophe, and a key theme for the event. I felt pretty good hearing that, since at Golden Capital, we've been of a mindset for nearly 10 years that economic development must focus squarely on innovation, entrepreneurship and investing if it wants to really make a difference in a community. I made the point in my presentation that technologic innovation from universities or national labs --as revolutionary as it may be -- doesn't mean very much unless it can get to market. It takes an entrepreneur to do that. The best researchers and academics are usually not the best entrepreneurs.

What this means for us at GCN is a continued focus on building regional collaborations that involve the research institutions, and that we must also continue to encourage our regional members to reach out to the "most likely to succeed" entrepreneurs and high into the ranks of the private sector within a community to connect entrepreneurs with the capital and advice they need to grow.

Venture Communities is designed to do exactly that and we'll keep beating that drum until see it -- or something comparable -- instituted throughout the nation, or we break under the weight of those who can't see the writing on the wall. Either way the wind blows, we'll keep fighting. Because if you aren't part of the solution...